Serving 58 countries with certified connectivity solutions — Talk to an engineer

I Specified the Wrong Phoenix Contact Power Supply Twice. Here's How to Choose Between QUINT and STEP

The Short Version

I've been designing industrial control panels for 8 years. I've personally made—and documented—14 significant specification mistakes, totaling roughly $23,000 in wasted budget. At least a third of that was power supply related.

This article is about the two Phoenix Contact power supply families I keep going back to: QUINT and STEP. Both are available as 480VAC to 24VDC power supply units. Both mount on DIN rail. Both are excellent products. But they are not interchangeable—and I learned that the hard way, twice.

Why Compare Them at All?

Here's the thing nobody tells you when you start: the product line name isn't just marketing. QUINT and STEP are engineered for completely different jobs. If you pick based on price, or based on what's in stock at your distributor, you're gambling with your customer's production line.

I'll compare them across four practical dimensions:

  1. Physical size — what actually fits in your cabinet
  2. Electrical performance — how each handles real-world loads, not just datasheet specs
  3. Diagnostics and monitoring — what they tell you when something goes wrong
  4. Total cost — not just the sticker price

Each section ends with a clear takeaway. No fence-sitting.

Dimension 1: Physical Size

STEP wins. Not by a little—by a lot.

A STEP power supply at the same output rating is dramatically slimmer than a QUINT. In retrofit projects, where I'm often working inside an enclosure built in a different decade, those millimeters decide whether I need a second DIN rail, a bigger cabinet, or the stuff I'm trying to avoid entirely: a customer conversation that starts with "we need to increase your budget."

In 2019, I was retrofitting a packaging line where the customer refused to upgrade the enclosure. The original design called for a QUINT. It didn't fit. We spent two weeks negotiating panel modifications, and eventually switched to STEP. Problem solved in a day. Space is the one dimension where the premium model simply doesn't compete.

The takeaway: If cabinet space is your constraint, STEP is probably the right call. Simple.

Dimension 2: Electrical Performance (Where My First Mistake Happened)

It's tempting to think a 24V power supply is just a voltage converter. Match the wattage, match the voltage, done. That oversimplification cost me $1,850 and a two-week delay.

In my first year (2017), I ordered 37 power supplies for a packaging line. I checked the steady-state load, did the math, and picked a supply that fit the numbers. What I didn't account for was inrush current. Every time the compressed-air solenoid bank fired, the output voltage dipped. The PLC brown-out reset mid-cycle. Products got rejected. The line stopped. My senior engineer diagnosed it in about 20 minutes. I'd chosen a STEP when the application needed the QUINT's SFB technology.

For those unfamiliar: SFB (Selective Fuse Breaking) allows the QUINT to deliver up to 6x its rated current briefly—enough to handle motor starts and solenoid banks without the voltage collapse that resets PLCs. STEP supplies don't do that. They're designed for steady loads: sensors, controllers, small relays. In that role, they're rock solid. I've built hundreds of panels with STEP supplies running electronics, and they've been boringly reliable.

The March 2023 failure was the one that really stuck with me. A small 24V DC motor was added to an existing machine. It looked fine on paper—running current well within the STEP's rating. But the startup spike wasn't. The supply's output collapsed, the PLC reset, the whole line stopped. Diagnosis took two days. The fix: a QUINT of the same wattage. It coasted through the kick like nothing happened.

The takeaway: If your load has motors, solenoid valves, big capacitors, or anything with meaningful inrush, choose QUINT. If it's purely electronic loads, STEP handles it fine.

Dimension 3: Diagnostics and Monitoring

I used to think diagnostics were overrated. Then a customer's machine started shutting down intermittently, and I spent three hours with a multimeter before finding the cause.

QUINT supplies have integrated alarm relay contacts and a digital status output. You can wire those to your PLC and know remotely when the supply is overloaded, switched to buffer mode, or failing. That's not a luxury—it's a huge time-saver during troubleshooting.

STEP supplies have a green "DC OK" LED. That's it. And honestly? For a lot of machines, that's all you need.

The question isn't which has more features. The question is: can you afford to walk to the cabinet every time you need to check the supply? For a critical process running 24/7, the QUINT's remote alarms are worth every cent. For a bench test rig or an intermittent-use machine, the LED is fine. Don't pay for diagnostics you'll never wire up.

The takeaway: QUINT for critical processes. STEP for everything else.

Dimension 4: Total Cost of Ownership (The Unexpected One)

Here's where I'm going to upset some people: STEP is the right choice for the majority of control panels.

Most loads in industrial automation are steady-state electronics. A PLC, some sensors, a few relays. STEP handles all of that without breaking a sweat at a noticeably lower price. If you buy QUINT for those applications, you're spending maybe 30% more for features you'll never use. I've done it. It feels good at the purchase moment. It's still wasted budget.

But. If your machine runs 24/7 and downtime means lost production, the math flips. Here's the calculation I now run with every customer:

  • Base price of the power supply
  • + cost of any alarm relays or monitoring modules you need to add separately
  • + expected downtime cost over 5 years (failure probability × production loss per hour)
  • + service call cost if the supply trips in the field

In 2021, a customer's line lost 4 hours of production because of a failed supply. The service call alone was $480. Their production loss was bigger—a lot bigger. A QUINT would have cost $60 to $80 more at purchase time and had a longer expected lifespan.

The takeaway: Run the numbers. The cheapest supply isn't the cheapest supply.

Connectors and Crimping: The Underrated Part

While we're on the subject, let me cover something that gets ignored in the QUINT vs STEP debate: how you wire them. A power supply is only as reliable as its connections.

If you're new to this world—and the question "what is a connector" may be why you're here—a connector is simply a device that joins electrical circuits. On a power supply, the input and output terminals where your wires land are connectors. And a crimper is the tool you use to attach a wire ferrule or terminal end to a stranded wire before inserting it into that connector.

Why does this matter? Because a loose or poorly crimped connection under load will heat up, oxidize, and eventually fail. I've tracked down three "mystery" power supply failures that turned out to be bad crimps at the terminal block. The wire looked fine. The ferrule looked fine. But the crimp wasn't tight enough—heat buildup over months finally killed the connection.

Phoenix Contact sells the tooling too (the CRIMPFIX series and matching ferrules). Use them. A proper crimp is the cheapest insurance you'll ever buy on a $30,000 panel.

If You're Buying in Brazil

Quick note for readers in Latin America: Phoenix Contact Brasil carries the common QUINT and STEP variants locally, and the 480VAC to 24VDC versions are typically in stock. That makes a big difference on lead time—local stock beats a 4 to 6-week ocean freight wait.

That said, don't let local inventory alone drive your spec. Confirm the product family based on your load requirements first, then check availability. I've seen teams buy what's available instead of what's right. It rarely ends well.

My Simple Decision Rule

After eight years and enough mistakes to fill a binder, here's the checklist I use with my own team:

Choose QUINT when: you have inrush loads (motors, solenoid banks), you need remote alarms or diagnostics, or your customer's downtime cost exceeds the price difference.

Choose STEP when: your loads are steady electronic circuits, cabinet space is limited, or the budget is tight enough that over-engineering is a real problem.

No universal winner. No "QUINT is always better." Just a match between the supply's strengths and your application's reality.

We've been using this checklist for 18 months now, and it's caught 47 wrong specifications before they hit production. It would have saved me $1,850 back in 2017. Maybe it'll save you from your first expensive mistake.

author avatar
Jane Smith

I’m Jane Smith, a senior content writer with over 15 years of experience in the packaging and printing industry. I specialize in writing about the latest trends, technologies, and best practices in packaging design, sustainability, and printing techniques. My goal is to help businesses understand complex printing processes and design solutions that enhance both product packaging and brand visibility.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *